Post by account_disabled on Jan 26, 2024 22:32:53 GMT -8
Treaty Organization (NATO) in 1945, and its geopolitical response the Warsaw Pact in 1955. It had been created the so-called world of the Cold War or of the two blocs, while, except for the countries of Latin America and some other isolated cases, the rest of the world was constituted by the colonized, politically-legally colonized world. Of these structures, two have already disappeared. Firstly, the colonized world , giving rise to a multitude of new countries (they even make up the majority of the members of the UN today), but, this is important, not completely decolonized, but only politically-legally decolonized. , because a good number remained (and continue to be) economically-commercially neo-colonized, which is why “the official Western narrative” has gone from designating them as “the third world” to designating them as “the global south”, two names that are equally ambiguous.
The other international structure (and dynamic) that has already disappeared is the Cold War itself and its materialization in the “east and west” blocs, as a consequence of the collapse of the Soviet Union (December 1991) and the Phone Number Database disappearance of the “communist bloc.” and its Warsaw Pact (July 1991). In exchange, and not too many years ago (“ Pacific Turn ” by President Obama , 2009-2010), today, we can enjoy the competition for commercial and, increasingly, geopolitical hegemony, between the United States (and its adjectives the European Union, the G7 and NATO+) and China, increasingly, also, supported by the countries of those new entities of diffuse cooperation and variable geometry that are becoming known as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) or the BRICS+ .
Civil war in West Africa? To these two important changes in the structure of international relations as a result of the readjustment of power at the end of the Second World War, we must add the significant change produced in its dynamics (international finances) in 1971, when the United States (Nixon Administration), alleging an excessive international trade deficit, it abandons the support for its currency (the dollar) of the gold standard in international transactions, to which it was subject according to the Bretton Woods Agreements (1944), thus, in effect, converting the Federal Reserve American in the incontestable arbiter of international trade (dollarization of the world economy) of capital importance for the functioning of the IMF and the WB. A move that would be completed a few years later (late 1970s) with the rise to power of Mrs.
The other international structure (and dynamic) that has already disappeared is the Cold War itself and its materialization in the “east and west” blocs, as a consequence of the collapse of the Soviet Union (December 1991) and the Phone Number Database disappearance of the “communist bloc.” and its Warsaw Pact (July 1991). In exchange, and not too many years ago (“ Pacific Turn ” by President Obama , 2009-2010), today, we can enjoy the competition for commercial and, increasingly, geopolitical hegemony, between the United States (and its adjectives the European Union, the G7 and NATO+) and China, increasingly, also, supported by the countries of those new entities of diffuse cooperation and variable geometry that are becoming known as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) or the BRICS+ .
Civil war in West Africa? To these two important changes in the structure of international relations as a result of the readjustment of power at the end of the Second World War, we must add the significant change produced in its dynamics (international finances) in 1971, when the United States (Nixon Administration), alleging an excessive international trade deficit, it abandons the support for its currency (the dollar) of the gold standard in international transactions, to which it was subject according to the Bretton Woods Agreements (1944), thus, in effect, converting the Federal Reserve American in the incontestable arbiter of international trade (dollarization of the world economy) of capital importance for the functioning of the IMF and the WB. A move that would be completed a few years later (late 1970s) with the rise to power of Mrs.
